Mahoneys: Responsibility For Utility Infrastructure Maintenance

The person responsible for utility infrastructure – whether it be an air-conditioning unit, electricity wires and cables, smoke alarms, plumbing or stormwater drainage – is one of the most common questions that arise in a community titles scheme.

In order to answer this question, it is first necessary to consider who owns the infrastructure – which is determined by whether the utility infrastructure constitutes common property. If the infrastructure is common property, it is owned by the body corporate.

The Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) (BCCMA) provides that utility infrastructure is common property, unless it is:

(a)        solely related to supplying utility services to a lot; and

(b)        within the boundaries of the lot; and

(c)        located other than within a boundary structure for the lot.

There are also other exceptions that exclude utility infrastructure from being common property including where:

(a)        the Body Corporate is party to an agreement which confirms that ownership does not vest with the Body Corporate;  or

(b)        the utility infrastructure is a device which measures water reticulation or supply of water for a community titles scheme established after 1 January 2008 and it was installed after 1 January 2008 under a permit issued under the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2018 or in relation to a compliance request made after 31 December 2007 under the repealed Plumbing and Drainage Act 2002 on infrastructure which supplies water to a lot or common property.

If the utility infrastructure is common property, then the Body Corporate has an obligation to attend to maintenance, unless a further exception applies.

One such exception can be found at section 180(4) of the Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation 2020 which relevantly provides:

the owner of the lot is responsible for maintaining, in good order and condition, utility infrastructure, including utility infrastructure situated on common property to the extent the utility infrastructure –

(i)         relates only to supplying utility services to the owner’s lot; and

(ii)        is 1 of the following types—

(A)        hot-water systems;

(B)        washing machines;

(C)        clothes dryers;

(D)        solar panels;

(E)        air-conditioning systems;

(F)         television antennae;

(G)        another device providing a utility service to a lot.


In Ocean Plaza Apartments [2023] QBCCMCmr 9 (OPA Case) the adjudicator considered the application of the Exception, relevantly providing (our emphasis):

While there is little doubt that grease traps are ‘utility infrastructure’ within the meaning of section 20 of the Act, the question arises whether the grease traps at the scheme constitute a “device” providing a utility service to the applicant’s lot and whether the relevant pipe is ‘associated’ with the grease traps…

…Even if I were to find that the grease traps are a device providing a utility service to the Commercial Lot, I do not believe that the Subject Pipes are “associated” with those devices. The Subject Pipes form part of the Sewerage System which is separate (but connected to) the Trade Waste System. I am of the view that “associated” must mean directly associated with the utility service supplied by the device. The cast iron pipe is not directly associated with the grease trap system because it is downstream from the grease trap system and carries both trade waste and effluent from the sewerage system. Unless the pipes relate only to the device supplying the utility service to the lot, it cannot be properly considered to be “associated” with the device for the purpose of subsection 170(4)(a) of the Accommodation Module.

Ultimately, the Exception will only apply to make a lot owner responsible for:

(a)       a device (such as an air-conditioning unit) which solely services its lot in the Scheme; and

(b)       cables, wires, pipes, sewers, drains, ducts, plant and equipment which are directly connected to the device and do not relate to other infrastructure services.

In the OPA Case, the cast iron pipes removed both trade waste and effluent from the Scheme and were not directly and solely connected to a device (such as a grease trap) which only serviced a single lot. For this reason, the cast iron  pipes were not subject to the Exception and are the maintenance obligation of the body corporate.

Mahoneys’ dedicated body corporate team regularly advise lot owners and bodies corporate on the maintenance obligations of utility infrastructure.

Feel free to contact us if you need assistance with determining body corporate maintenance obligations.

Author: Holly Oddo, Mahoneys 

How Can We Help You?

Call us on 07 3435 5300 and one of our friendly consultants will help